Here we go again

It came as a surprise to no one when, on Wednesday, Federal Judge Vaughn R. Walker threw out California Proposition 8 (2008) on grounds that it is unconstitutional.

This leaves me in an awkward situation.  I agree with the ruling–Prop 8 violates the 14th amendment,  which guarantees due process and  equal protection.  I’m even going to say it also violates the 1st amendment, in that I believe that marriage is primarily a religious institution, and government shouldn’t restrict who can marry whom, as long as all parties are in agreement.

At the same time, I’m trying to be a good Mormon.  Really.  I understand the Church’s opposition to gay marriage, even if I can’t explain it to anyone who hasn’t been to the Temple. (Not because of anything that happens in the Temple, mind, it’s just that you must have a certain level of faith and understanding before you can enter into the Temple.) But…bad things tend to happen when the Church gets mixed up in politics.  Just ask Brigham Young and James Buchanan.

In 2008, I disagreed with Prop 8, but kept my mouth shut, partly because I’m a coward and knew I was in the minority, being surrounded by Mormons who apparently have more faith in their leaders than I do, and mostly because I was wrestling with my own feelings.  Truth told, a big part of my opposition to Prop 8 came straight from a California native co-worker of mine who would wander around the office talking about how gays were a blight on society, and how he wished he was back in California so he could vote on it. (I wished he was back in California too.  He wouldn’t shut up about how much better California is than  Utah.  Seriously, dude, no one is forcing you to live here.)

He was so hateful and bigoted–which I can’t stand on anyone.  When I see people like that, it’s a knee-jerk reaction of mine to support whatever it is they are so hateful and bigoted against.  And now, I’m seeing the same bigoted reaction coming from people who should know better.

The biggest complaint that I’m hearing goes along the lines of  “The people voted for this.  The government shouldn’t be throwing out what the people voted for.  We’re a democracy, for cryin’ out loud.”

Okay, Corianne, deep breath.  Let’s take this in a calm and reasonable manner.

The whole point of the Constitution and the Judicial Branch of government is to prevent laws that are unjust.  The reason that Justice Walker threw out Prop 8 is because he found it unconstitutional.  In fact, California Attorney General Jerry Brown chose not to defend Prop 8  in Perry v. Schwarzenegger (despite being named as a defendant) because he could see that it was unconstitutional.  This wasn’t just some random guy deciding that he didn’t like the ruling.

The other thing, is the United States is not a democracy, it’s a constitutional republic.  Citizens are not expected, or required to vote on every issue.  There are times, when laws come up for popular vote–like California’s Proposition system, but those laws are not held sacrosanct simply because the people voted for them.  They are subject to the same checks and balances as laws formed by the legislative branch.

We are far from hearing the end of this issue.  I can guarantee that it will go all the way to the Supreme Court of the United States.  In the mean time, I’d like to echo a portion the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saint’s official statement about the ruling–

“There is no doubt that today’s ruling will add to the marriage debate in this country, and we urge people on all sides of this issue to act in a spirit of mutual respect and civility toward those with a different opinion.”

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , ,

One response to “Here we go again”

  1. Dave says :

    Well said, Corianne.

    The thing that I think is sadly lost on most members (and apparently the church as an organization) is that an all-powerful God wouldn’t need men to enforce morality on others. Furthermore a God whose plan of salvation relied on the exercise of agency wouldn’t want his people forcing others to obey. These principles are probably best summed up in Alma ch. 31, vs. 5:

    “the preaching of the word had a great tendency to lead the people to do that which was just—yea, it had had more powerful effect upon the minds of the people than the sword, or anything else, which had happened unto them”

    In other words, rather than using force (via the sword or the law), you’ll have much more success in changing people by preaching the word to them. Tell your message to people and if it has merit, they’ll be convinced.

    Marriage, from a governmental perspective, is ultimately a contract between people granting certain rights (over property, taxation, medical care, etc.). There is no constitutional justification for preventing consenting adults from entering into a private contract. What we need is a complete separation of the two systems: churches can solemnize unions as being blessed by God, but those ceremonies carry no legal significance. The state can register/record a contractual union which carries no requirement for recognition by churches.

    On another note, you are not anywhere near being alone in your viewpoint. I know many LDS people who share your conviction but are afraid to speak up, for fear of retribution, ostracization (I invented a word!), or punishment.

%d bloggers like this: